“Good Money at the Time”

On summer vacation, I recently visited Mount Rushmore. It’s amazing structure, and the story of its construction is as impressive as the monument itself. Much of the story you learn when visiting is the story of its creation. As an economist, of course seeing the following display with wage data got me very excited:

While the sign says that laborers made 30 cents per hour, searching online it appears that 50 cents was more common. More skilled workers, such as assistant sculptors, made $1.50 per hour. These were, as the sign says, “good wages” for that time. In the economy generally, production workers made around 50 cents per hour our as well around that time period, and most of the construction of Rushmore was during the Depression (some of the workers were WPA funded), so having any job, much less one that paid pre-Depression wages, was certainly a good one.

How does this compare to wages today? This is always a tricky question, as I have documented on this blog several times before, but the most straight forward approach (and good first approximation) is a simple CPI inflation adjustment. Using 1929 as the baseline year, when construction was in full swing, 30 cents an hour is roughly $5 today, 50 cents per hour is close to $9, and $1.50 would be about $26.50. That doesn’t sound too bad!

The best comparison I like to use is BLS’s average hourly earnings for private production and non-supervisory workers. Averages aren’t perfect, but this measure excludes management occupations that will be distorting the average. In May 2023, that wage was $28.75 per hour. So the average worker today earns 3-6 times as much per hour as these “good paying jobs” in the late 1920s and the Depression. And, as the Rushmore signage notes, these jobs were seasonal. Their off-season jobs probably paid even less.

The wage of the assistant sculptor does compare well with average wages today, but that pay was unusual for the time and was likely a highly skilled worker. The only record I can find of anyone making that much at Rushmore was Lincoln Borglum, the son of the main sculptor Gutzon Borglum. Lincoln oversaw the completion of the project after Gutzon’s death, and it was only in later years on the project that his pay was increased to $1.50 per hour.

For the typical laborer on Rushmore, having a good job was indeed good to have, but the wages pale in comparison to a typical worker today.

2 thoughts on ““Good Money at the Time”

  1. Gale Pooley's avatar Gale Pooley June 14, 2023 / 10:45 pm

    Jeremy,

    Good article.

    I assume that the BLS wage rate does not include benefits. Is that a good assumption?

    Best,

    Gale

    Like

  2. Zachary Bartsch's avatar Zachary Bartsch June 16, 2023 / 8:06 am

    The word “good” in good wages is doing a lot of legwork. A brief FRED search reveals:

    –Average Union Hourly Earnings in Building Trades
    $1.359 (1928)
    https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?g=16czt

    –Average Absolute Annual Earnings of Employees or Wage Earners in All Manufacturing (Annual/(365*6/7)/8)
    $0.5289 (1928)
    https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?g=16czU

    –Average Hourly Earnings, Twenty-Five Manufacturing Industries
    $0.59 (1929)
    https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?g=16czK

    –Wage and salary accruals per full-time equivalent employee: Domestic private industries: Mining: Nonmetallic minerals, except fuels (Annual/(365*6/7)/8)
    $0.5629 (1929)
    https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?g=16cAa

    –Wage and salary accruals per full-time equivalent employee: Domestic private industries: Bituminous and other soft coal mining (Annual/(365*6/7)/8)
    $0.5166 (1929)
    https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?g=16cAu

    If we change a bunch of these to 5 workdays per week rather than 6, then the Mt. Rushmore wages start to look a lot less “good”.

    Like

Leave a reply to Gale Pooley Cancel reply