Manufacturing Compensation in the Long Run

You may have heard that there is a new viral song which deals with a few economic issues. Noah Smith has a good analysis of “Rich Men North of Richmond,” which he mostly finds to be incorrect in its analysis (for example, of welfare policy). But Smith does say that the song has a point: manufacturing wages haven’t performed well in recent years. Not only has pay for factory workers “[lagged] the national average in recent years,” for those workers in Virginia, it’s lower in real terms than in 2010.

Well that all doesn’t sound good! Smith is only going back to about 2000 with the data he shows. What if we took a longer run perspective? What if we took a really long-run perspecitive?

Here’s wages for blue-collar factor workers that goes back to 1939 in the US:

The wage data (for manufacturing production workers) is from BLS and the PCE price index is from the BEA. What do you notice as you look at the data?

First, it is true that the last 20 years or so hasn’t been great. Only about 8% cumulative growth since 2002. That’s not great!

But as you look back further, you’ll notice that gains are substantial. Compared to what some might consider the “golden age” of manufacturing wages, the early 1950s, real wages have roughly doubled. It’s true, the growth rate from 1939-1973 is much, much better than the following 50 years. Wouldn’t it be nice if that growth rate had continued! But no doubt you’ve seen many memes saying something like “in the 1950s you could support a family on one high-school graduate income, but not today!” This data suggests that view of the 1950s is a little distorted by nostalgia.

One final thing to note: we might think that one big change in recent decades is that a lot more compensation goes to benefits, rather than wages. There’s actually a total compensation series for blue-collar workers going all the way back to 1790:

The total compensation data, as well as the CPI data that I used to inflation-adjust the figures (to 2022 dollars), comes from the fantastic resource Measuring Worth. This is a total compensation measurement, so it includes benefits, but the source data tells us that up until the late 1930s, it’s really just a wage measure. So potentially we could splice this together with the above chart, to get a “wage only” series covering the entire history of the US.

However, when we look at total compensation, we still see the post-1970s stagnation. Real compensation is roughly the same as about 1977. Yikes! Note here that we’re using the CPI, since the PCE index only goes back to 1929, and the CPI tends to overstate inflation (yes, that’s right, sorry CPI truthers). Still, it’s not the most optimistic picture.

Or isn’t it? With all of the automation and global competition in manufacturing coming on board in the past 50 years, perhaps our baseline is that things could have been much worse. In any case, if we look at total compensation, it’s currently about double what it was in the post-WW2 era. That’s even with the dip in 2022 due to high CPI inflation.

Wages and compensation of blue-collar productions workers have indeed been growing slowly for the past few decades. That much is true. On the other hand, they are still among the highest they have ever been in history, over 50 times (not 50%, 50 times!) higher than at the birth of this nation. This ranks them as probably the highest wages anywhere in world history for an occupation that doesn’t require an advanced degree. That history is worth knowing.

3 thoughts on “Manufacturing Compensation in the Long Run

  1. Shawn's avatar Shawn August 16, 2023 / 2:04 pm

    Another couple of graphs where the appearance of Ronald Reagan and anti-unionism is easily spotted.

    Like

    • Scott Buchanan's avatar Scott Buchanan August 21, 2023 / 7:57 pm

      And perhaps the entry of women into the workforce, swelling the ranks of workers; the rise of foreign manufacturing competition as Germany and Japan finished recovery from WWII; and on-and-off recessions in 1970s- early 1980s.

      Like

Leave a reply to Jeremy Horpedahl Cancel reply